The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

×
CLINICAL SYNTHESISFull Access

Medication Treatments for Social Anxiety Disorder

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1176/foc.9.3.foc273

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder or social phobia (SP) is defined as “the intense fear of becoming humiliated in social situations, specifically of embarrassing yourself in front of other people” (National Institute of Mental Health, 2000). It affects between 6% and 15% of the general U.S. population (1), is the third most common psychiatric disorder, and is extremely debilitating to those who have it. Individuals with SP are extremely fearful and avoid social situations (APA, 2000). The fear is caused primarily by feelings that they will be humiliated or embarrassed. The onset of SP is usually in childhood or adolescence, and the disorder occurs more often in women than in men. Many people are so affected by it that they cannot work and cannot start or maintain personal or professional relationships; in addition, an unusually high rate of comorbid depression is seen in individuals with SP. More recently, interest has focused on the development course of SP, leading to a reconceptualization of the disorder as a chronic neurodevelopment illness rather than one manifesting for the first time in adulthood (2). In recent years, our knowledge of SP has included important advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, neurobiology, and neural circuitry of SP. In this clinical synthesis, we will review the diagnosis, psychopharmacological treatment, and recent questions and controversy regarding this debilitating, yet treatable, disorder. DSM-IV-TR criteria for social anxiety disorder are listed in Table 1.

CLINICAL CONTEXT

SP is the third most prevalent psychiatric disorder in the United States following major depression and alcoholism. SP often appears in adolescence with a mean age of onset of 15 years with a slightly higher prevalence in women than in men (3, 4). Despite its high prevalence, barriers in both identifying and treating social anxiety symptoms cause many individuals with social anxiety symptoms to experience delays in obtaining treatment (5). Many individuals with SP are unaware that they have a treatable condition. Other barriers include avoidance in seeking treatment because of the fear and stigma of the illness and, in those individuals who do seek treatment, the possibility of being either underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed by clinicians. Many clinicians may lack knowledge about SP and view it as a normal variant of shyness and something many people “will simply outgrow.” Moreover, because of the high comorbidity of SP with both depression and alcohol use, the assessment and treatment may focus on these comorbid conditions (6). Major depression is one of the most frequent comorbid conditions associated with SP. The risk for subsequent depression was twice that in patients with SP compared with that in those individuals without SP (7). The importance of identifying and treating SP is underscored by findings that the suicide attempt rate for individuals with comorbid SP is 16-fold greater than that of those depressed individuals without SP (8); moreover, another study demonstrated that social anxiety disorder was associated with almost one and one-half times the risk of having suicidal thoughts (9).

DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH TO SP

Quick screening tool

A quick tool for screening for SP is shown in Table 2.

Table 1. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder

Table 1.

Table 1. DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic Criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder

Enlarge table

Table 2. Mini-SPIN Items*

Table 2.

* Optimum efficiency at a cutoff score of three for each item. SPIN, Social Phobia Inventory.

From Connor KM, Kobak KA, Churchill LE, Katzelnick D, Davidson JR: Mini-SPIN: a brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety 2001; 14:137–140. Reprinted with permission.

Table 2. Mini-SPIN Items*

Enlarge table

Differential diagnosis

The initial approach to diagnosis of SP begins with a general screening for anxiety symptoms, which often includes a simple question: “Do you feel anxious?” If the answer is “yes,” it is then important to rule out medical induced anxiety disorders such as (but not limited to) hypothyroidism, hypoglycemia, and mitral valve prolapse. It is also imperative to screen for current use of substances that might induce anxiety including stimulants, for example, cocaine or ephedrine. After these “medical and substance use” causes have been ruled out, the clinician can then narrow the focus to the predominant anxiety disorder the patient currently has. An anxiety screening question that incorporates the core features of SP including feeling embarrassment when speaking or being in front of others is often a logical next step. The differential diagnosis of SP includes generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder with agoraphobia (PD), and avoidant personality disorder (which will be discussed in the later section on controversies and questions). Unlike panic disorder, which begins in the 20s or 30s, the onset of SP is often in the early to mid teens. Moreover, the somatic symptoms of SP include blushing, sweating, and tremors, whereas those in PD involve shortness of breath and palpitations. The principle differences between SP and PD involve the cognitions and triggers. In PD, the cognitions involve a sense of impending doom and the triggers include a feeling of “wanting to escape.” In contrast, in SP, the cognitions involve fear and humiliation, and the triggers involve being scrutinized and being “the center of attention.” GAD is another anxiety disorder that is often in the differential diagnosis with SP. However, the onset of GAD is also somewhat later than that of SP, beginning in an individual's early 20s. Also, in contrast to SP, the somatic symptoms include chronic discomfort and muscle tension and often involve multiple organ systems; the cognitions in GAD involve excessive and chronic worry over minor matters and the triggers involve work, school, and social events.

TREATMENT STRATEGIES

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors

The current U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for the treatment of social anxiety disorder include fluvoxamine (Luvox CR), venlafaxine (Effexor XR), paroxetine (Paxil), Paxil CR, and sertraline (Zoloft). Similar to that for other anxiety disorders, the first-line pharmacotherapy includes the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with paroxetine, sertraline, and fluvoxamine CR all approved for the treatment of SP (10, 11). The serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (specifically venlafaxine) have also been demonstrated to be quite effective in treating individuals with this disorder (12, 13). It appears that the SSRIs and venlafaxine have roughly equivalent efficacy for SP (10). Large double-blind trials in a head-to-head comparison of venlafaxine and paroxetine found that both were equally effective (12, 14, 15). Benzodiazepines are considered a second-line treatment for SP with longer-acting agents such as clonazepam being preferred over shorter-acting medications such as alprazolam (1618). Unlike in panic disorder, the tricyclic antidepressants have demonstrated little efficacy in treating individuals with SP (19). Other agents such as bupropion and mirtazapine have shown some promise in early open-label studies, but more large, controlled studies are needed to evaluate their effectiveness for treating SP (20). Mirtazapine (a 5HT2, 5HT3, and α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist), in particular, showed efficacy in a single placebo-controlled trial with only female subjects at 30 mg/day (21, 22).

Other antidepressants

There have been no randomized control trials to date demonstrating the efficacy of bupropion in individuals with SP although open-label studies suggest some benefit (20). For those individuals with nongeneralized social anxiety (performance anxiety), β-blockers (such as atenolol) have been demonstrated to be quite effective in alleviating some of the symptoms (23, 24).

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) (irreversible) have also been shown to be quite effective in the treatment of social anxiety disorder stemming from earlier studies demonstrating both effectiveness in mixed phobic disorders (25) as well as improvement of interpersonal sensitivity in individuals with atypical depression (24). Phenelzine, in particular, has been shown to be effective in four double-blind placebo-controlled trials examining the efficacy of the MAOIs for social anxiety disorder (21). The reversible MAOIs have also been studied for the treatment of social anxiety disorder. Moclobemide has been shown to have generally positive results in studies in social anxiety disorder (14); however, one double-blind study demonstrated no statistical significance for moclobemide over placebo at the end of the 12-week study (14). Although it has not been marketed in the United States, another reversible MAOI, brofaromine, has demonstrated efficacy in SP in three placebo-controlled trials (14).

ANTICONVULSANTS: GABAPENTIN AND PREGABALIN

These medications have been postulated to work through binding to the α2δ subunit of voltage-sensitive calcium channels (21). There have been only a few studies with mixed results. Whereas in a 14-week placebo-controlled flexible dose study (26), gabapentin did reduce severity of symptoms as shown on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), there was a significant dropout rate due to side effects and only one-third of the patients had greater than a 50% reduction in symptoms. A 10-week placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin (27) demonstrated a greater decrease in the LSAS score at higher doses (600 mg/day) but not at lower doses, compared with controls. This result was supported by a more recent double-blind placebo-controlled fixed-dose study, which showed that higher dose treatment (600 mg) with pregabalin significantly improved LSAS scores among subjects with social anxiety disorder (28). Levetiracetam has unfortunately demonstrated disappointing results for the treatment of social anxiety disorder in several studies (29).

ANTIPSYCHOTICS AND SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER

There has been recent interest in investigating the efficacy of augmentation with atypical antipsychotics in both treatment-resistant depression and treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder. There have been relatively few studies looking at atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of social anxiety disorder. In particular, in a small study olanzapine as a monotherapy treatment appeared effective and tolerated between 2.5 and 20 mg/day (30). Another study involving quetiapine in which 15 patients were randomly assigned to 400 mg of quetiapine or placebo demonstrated no significant differences on the primary measures with the exception of Clinical Global Impression scales (40%–0%) (31). Moreover, another study looking at quetiapine given before public speaking exposures also did not yield significant results (32).

d-CYCLOSERINE

d-Cycloserine is an antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. It works as a partial agonist at the glycine modulatory site of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor and in preclinical studies has been shown to safely enhance learning and memory in several animal models (33). There have been several clinical studies investigating d-cycloserine in combination with exposure therapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders, all with promising results with the caveat that all the studies had relatively small sample sizes (34, 35).

QUESTIONS AND CONTROVERSY

Discrete versus generalized SP

What exactly is SP? The vast majority of the studies involving SP view the disorder under one major category. This category encompasses both generalized SP, in which individuals are fearful of most social situations and hypersensitive to criticism, and discrete SP (performance anxiety), in which individuals are fearful of speaking or performing in public. There is growing controversy as to whether it is appropriate to distinguish between these two subtypes. A recent review concluded that there was insufficient evidence to distinguish between the two and the symptoms of social anxiety disorder fell along a “continuum of severity based on the number of fears” (36). However, other earlier studies have illuminated the differences in transmission between these two subtypes. In one study, it was shown that the rates of familial transmission were 16% for generalized SP compared with a substantially lower transmission rate of 6% for patients with discrete SP (37). Another study examining the transmission of SP found that subjects with generalized social phobia and persons with avoidant personality disorder had a 10 times higher rate of familial transmission compared with control subjects, whereas they found no significant difference between individuals with discrete social phobia and the control population (38). Another area that has always intrigued researchers studying SP has been the different response to pharmacological treatment exhibited by the two subtypes of SP. Generalized social phobia seems to respond quite effectively to SSRIs (39), irreversible MAOIs such as phenelzine (Nardil) (40) and benzodiazepines (16), whereas discrete social phobia responds particularly well to β-blockers such as atenolol (23). Thus, the findings from both genetic transmission and pharmacological studies converge in demonstrating significant differences between the two subtypes of SP and, in turn, lead to the theory that there may be separate neurotransmitters and distinct neural circuitry involved in generalized social phobia and discrete social phobia.

Are social anxiety disorder and avoidant personality disorder the same disorder?

Another area of controversy involves whether to classify SP and avoidant personality disorder as two separate entities or whether they are essentially the same disorder. Although some reviews have shown no consistent clinical differences in symptom presentation (41), more recent studies have demonstrated qualitative differences between the two disorders; specifically, they have shown that the symptoms of avoidant personality disorder are more severe and broader in nature (42). Other studies examining differences in genetics (43) and treatment response (both behavioral and pharmacological) showed no compelling evidence that they should be viewed as two separate disorders.

SUMMARY

In summary, social anxiety disorder is an extremely prevalent and disabling disorder but also a disorder that can be effectively treated with medications including SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, and benzodiazepines. Promising novel medications include atypical antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, and the N-methyl-d-aspartate agonist d-cycloserine. There is still research to be conducted to help determine whether both SPs should be viewed as one disorder or two separate entities and whether avoidant personality disorder should be also viewed as a separate disorder.

Address correspondence to Jonathan Shaywitz, M.D., Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Drive, Room C-311, Los Angeles, CA 90048; e-mail: .

CME Disclosure

Jonathan Shaywitz, M.D., Director of Anxiety Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8730 Alden Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90048

Dr. Shaywitz reports no competing interests.

REFERENCES

1 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE: Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:593–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar

2 Mathew SJ, Coplan JD, Gorman JM: Neurobiological mechanisms of social anxiety disorder. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158:1558–1567CrossrefGoogle Scholar

3 Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Dawson DA, Goldstein RB, Smith S, Huang B, Saha TD: The epidemiology of DSM-IV panic disorder and agoraphobia in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67:363–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar

4 Dalrymple KL, Herbert JD, Gaudiano BA: Onset of illness and developmental factors in social anxiety disorder: findings from a retrospective interview. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2007; 29:101–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar

5 Wagner R, Silove D, Marnane C, Rouen DD: Delays in referral of patients with social phobia, panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder attending a specialist anxiety clinic. J Anxiety Disord 2006; 20:363–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar

6 Bruce TJ, Saeed SA: Social anxiety disorder: a common, underrecognized mental disorder. Am Fam Physician 1999; 60:2311–2320, 2322Google Scholar

7 Beesdo K, Bittner A, Pine DS, Stein MB, Höfler M, Lieb R, Wittchen HU: Incidence of social anxiety disorder and the consistent risk for secondary depression in the first three decades of life. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007; 64:903–912CrossrefGoogle Scholar

8 Ballenger JC, Davidson JR, Lecrubier Y, Nutt DJ, Bobes J, Beidel DC, Ono Y, Westenberg HG: Consensus statement on social anxiety disorder from the International Consensus Group on Depression and Anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(suppl 17):54–60Google Scholar

9 Olfson M, Guardino M, Struening E, Schneier FR, Hellman F, Klein DF: Barriers to the treatment of social anxiety. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157:521–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar

10 Blanco C, Raza MS, Schneier FR, Liebowitz MR: The evidence-based pharmacological treatment of social anxiety disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2003; 6:427–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar

11 Stein MB, Chartier MJ, Hazen AL, Kroft CD, Chale RA, Coté D, Walker JR: Paroxetine in the treatment of generalized social phobia: open-label treatment and double-blind placebo-controlled discontinuation. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 16:218–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar

12 Allgulander C, Mangano R, Zhang J, Dahl AA, Lepola U, Sjödin I, Emilien G, SAD 388 Study Group: Efficacy of venlafaxine ER in patients with social anxiety disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison with paroxetine. Hum Psychopharmacol 2004; 19:387–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar

13 Rickels K, Mangano R, Khan A: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a flexible dose of venlafaxine ER in adult outpatients with generalized social anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004;24:488–496CrossrefGoogle Scholar

14 Ravindran LN, Stein MB: The pharmacologic treatment of anxiety disorders: a review of progress. Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:839–854CrossrefGoogle Scholar

15 Liebowitz MR, Gelenberg AJ, Munjack D: Venlafaxine extended release vs placebo and paroxetine in social anxiety disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62:190–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar

16 Davidson JR, Potts N, Richichi E, Krishnan R, Ford SM, Smith R, Wilson WH: Treatment of social phobia with clonazepam and placebo. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1993; 13:423–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar

17 Gelernter CS, Uhde TW, Cimbolic P, Arnkoff DB, Vittone BJ, Tancer ME, Bartko JJ: Cognitive-behavioral and pharmacological treatments of social phobia. A controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48:938–945CrossrefGoogle Scholar

18 Munjack DJ, Baltazar PL, Bohn PB, Cabe DD, Appleton AA. Clonazepam in the treatment of social phobia: a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 1990; 51(suppl):35–40; discussion 50–53.Google Scholar

19 Simpson HB, Schneier FR, Campeas RB, Marshall RD, Fallon BA, Davies S, Klein DF, Liebowitz MR: Imipramine in the treatment of social phobia. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1998; 18:132–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar

20 Emmanuel NP, Brawman-Mintzer O, Morton WA, Book SW, Johnson MR, Lorberbaum JP, Ballenger JC, Lydiard RBB: Bupropion-SR in treatment of social phobia. Depress Anxiety 2000;12:111–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar

21 Schneier FR: Pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2011; 12:615–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar

22 Muehlbacher M, Nickel MK, Nickel C, Kettler C, Lahmann C, Pedrosa Gil F, Leiberich PK, Rother N, Bachler E, Fartacek R, Kaplan P, Tritt K, Mitterlehner F, Anvar J, Rother WK, Loew TH, Egger C: Mirtazapine treatment of social phobia in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 25:580–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar

23 Gorman JM, Liebowitz MR, Fyer AJ, Campeas R, Klein DF: Treatment of social phobia with atenolol. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1985; 5:298–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar

24 Liebowitz MR, Quitkin FM, Stewart JW, McGrath PJ, Harrison W, Rabkin J, Tricamo E, Markowitz JS, Klein DF: Phenelzine v imipramine in atypical depression. A preliminary report. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41:669–677CrossrefGoogle Scholar

25 Sheehan DV, Ballenger J, Jacobsen G. Treatment of endogenous anxiety with phobic, hysterical, and hypochondriacal symptoms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980; 37:51–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar

26 Pande AC, Davidson JR, Jefferson JW, Janney CA, Katzelnick DJ, Weisler RH, Greist JH, Sutherland SM: Treatment of social phobia with gabapentin: a placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1999; 19:341–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar

27 Pande AC, Feltner DE, Jefferson JW, Davidson JR, Pollack M, Stein MB, Lydiard RB, Futterer R, Robinson P, Slomkowski M, DuBoff E, Phelps M, Janney CA, Werth JL: Efficacy of the novel anxiolytic pregabalin in social anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled, multicenter study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004; 24:141–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar

28 Feltner DE, Liu-Dumaw M, Schweizer E, Bielski R: Efficacy of pregabalin in generalized social anxiety disorder: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2011; 26:213–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar

29 Stein MB, Ravindran LN, Simon NM, Liebowitz MR, Khan A, Brawman-Mintzer O, Lydiard RB, Pollack MH: Levetiracetam in generalized social anxiety disorder: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2010; 71:627–631CrossrefGoogle Scholar

30 Barnett SD, Kramer ML, Casat CD, Connor KM, Davidson JR: Efficacy of olanzapine in social anxiety disorder: a pilot study. J Psychopharmacol 2002; 16:365–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar

31 Vaishnavi S, Alamy S, Zhang W, Connor KM, Davidson JR: Quetiapine as monotherapy for social anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2007; 31:1464–1469CrossrefGoogle Scholar

32 Donahue CB, Kushner MG, Thuras PD, Murphy TG, Van Demark JB, Adson DE: Effect of quetiapine vs. placebo on response to two virtual public speaking exposures in individuals with social phobia. J Anxiety Disord 2009; 23:362–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar

33 Davis M, Ressler K, Rothbaum BO, Richardson RO: Effects of d-cycloserine on extinction: translation from preclinical to clinical work. Biol Psychiatry 2006; 60:369–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar

34 Ressler KJ, Rothbaum BO, Tannenbaum L, Anderson P, Graap K, Zimand E, Hodges L, Davis M: Cognitive enhancers as adjuncts to psychotherapy: use of d-cycloserine in phobic individuals to facilitate extinction of fear. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004; 61:1136–1144CrossrefGoogle Scholar

35 Hofmann SG, Meuret AE, Smits JA, Simon NM, Pollack MH, Eisenmenger K, Shiekh M, Otto MWW: Augmentation of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder with d-cycloserine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63:298–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar

36 Bögels SM, Alden L, Beidel DC, Clark LA, Pine DS, Stein MB, Voncken M. Social anxiety disorder: questions and answers for the DSM-V. Depress Anxiety 2010; 27:168–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar

37 Mannuzza S, Schneier FR, Chapman TF, Liebowitz MR, Klein DF, Fyer AJ: Generalized social phobia. Reliability and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995; 52:230–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar

38 Stein MB, Chartier MJ, Kozak MV, King N, Kennedy JL: Genetic linkage to the serotonin transporter protein and 5HT2A receptor genes excluded in generalized social phobia. Psychiatry Res 1998; 81:283–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar

39 Stein MB, Liebowitz MR, Lydiard RB, Pitts CD, Bushnell W, Gergel I: Paroxetine treatment of generalized social phobia (social anxiety disorder): a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280:708–711CrossrefGoogle Scholar

40 Liebowitz MR, Schneier F, Campeas R, Hollander E, Hatterer J, Fyer A, Gorman J, Papp L, Davies S, Gully R, et al. Phenelzine vs atenolol in social phobia. A placebo-controlled comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49:290–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar

41 Alden LE, Laposa JM, Taylor CT, Rider AG: Avoidant personality disorder: current status and future directions. J Person Disord 2002; 16:1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar

42 Hummelen B, Wilberg T, Pedersen G, Karterud S: The relationship between avoidant personality disorder and social phobia. Compr Psychiatry 2007; 48:348–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar

43 Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Czajkowski N, Torgersen S, Neale MC, Ørstavik RE, Tambs K, Kendler KS: The relationship between avoidant personality disorder and social phobia: a population-based twin study. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164:1722–1728CrossrefGoogle Scholar